Sopra Steria vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Sopra Steria (4.0/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.0/5) overall. Sopra Steria is the better choice for european enterprises wanting agentic AI from a research-active, European-headquartered systems integrator.. Endava is the stronger option for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sopra Steria vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sopra Steria | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1968 | 2000 |
| HQ | Paris, France | London, UK |
| Team size | 50,000–60,000 | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Best for | European enterprises wanting agentic AI from a research-active, European-headquartered systems integrator. | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team, time & materials | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published (typically six- to seven-figure enterprise programs) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, Azure AI | Python, OpenAI, LangChain |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare |
Sopra Steria vs Endava: overview
Sopra Steria
Sopra Steria Group SA was founded in 1968 and is headquartered in Paris, France, with approximately 58,000 employees, positioning itself as a European tech leader in consulting, digital services, and software development. In June 2026 it published the first European study dedicated to agentic commerce, based on a survey of 8,400 consumers across eight countries, estimating €310 billion in transactions could be assisted by AI agents across Europe within a decade — giving it a research-driven credibility angle among the larger European systems integrators on this list.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
Services and capabilities: Sopra Steria vs Endava
| Capability | Sopra Steria | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Sopra Steria vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Sopra Steria | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sopra Steria vs Endava
| Criterion | Sopra Steria | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published (typically six- to seven-figure enterprise programs) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sopra Steria vs Endava
| Dimension | Sopra Steria | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Manufacturing | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Large European enterprise programs needing agentic AI backed by original market research, Government or public-sector clients across EU member states with existing Sopra Steria relationships | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Dedicated team |
Sopra Steria vs Endava: pros and cons
| Sopra Steria | |
|---|---|
| + | Paris-headquartered European entity with nearly six decades of operating history since 1968 |
| + | Published original European agentic-commerce research (June 2026), an independently citable credibility signal |
| + | ~58,000 employees gives substantial bench depth for large European enterprise programs |
| + | Deep existing government and public-sector relationships across multiple EU member states |
| - | Standard enterprise contracting and procurement cycles run considerably longer than a boutique vendor's |
| - | Pricing typically sits well above mid-size and boutique competitors on this list |
| - | Buyers get a broad consulting team rather than the named-architect continuity smaller firms offer |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
Who should choose Sopra Steria?
Sopra Steria is the right choice for european enterprises wanting agentic AI from a research-active, European-headquartered systems integrator..
Published the first major European study on agentic commerce (June 2026, 8,400 consumers, 8 countries), giving it a distinctive research-led credibility angle.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published (typically six- to seven-figure enterprise programs). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Sopra Steria vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sopra Steria |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sopra Steria (Not published (typically six- to seven-figure enterprise programs)) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sopra Steria |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Sopra Steria vs Endava
| Use case | Sopra Steria fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large European enterprise programs needing agentic AI backed by original market research | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Government or public-sector clients across EU member states with existing Sopra Steria relationships | Strong | Limited | Sopra Steria |
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sopra Steria vs Endava
Sopra Steria (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. Published the first major European study on agentic commerce (June 2026, 8,400 consumers, 8 countries), giving it a distinctive research-led credibility angle.. It is best for european enterprises wanting agentic AI from a research-active, European-headquartered systems integrator..
Endava (4.0/5) is the better choice when uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sopra Steria vs Endava FAQ
Is Sopra Steria better than Endava?
Sopra Steria (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sopra Steria is better for european enterprises wanting agentic AI from a research-active, European-headquartered systems integrator.. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
How do Sopra Steria and Endava differ in pricing?
Sopra Steria uses retainer, dedicated team, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published (typically six- to seven-figure enterprise programs). Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sopra Steria or Endava?
Sopra Steria is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sopra Steria and Endava?
Sopra Steria's primary differentiator is: published the first major european study on agentic commerce (june 2026, 8,400 consumers, 8 countries), giving it a distinctive research-led credibility angle.. Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. They also differ in team size (50,000–60,000 vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published (typically six- to seven-figure enterprise programs) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Government & Public Sector vs Financial Services, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.