SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
SoftServe (3.9/5) edges ahead of Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) overall. SoftServe is the better choice for healthcare-focused European enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with three decades of Microsoft-centric digital transformation history.. Lasting Dynamics is the stronger option for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | SoftServe | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2015 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 11–50 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Healthcare-focused European enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with three decades of Microsoft-centric digital transformation history. | Buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, staff augmentation | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, Azure | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics: overview
SoftServe
SoftServe was founded in 1993 in Lviv, Ukraine, and now operates with dual headquarters in Lviv and Austin, Texas, with more than 10,000 employees. Its three-decade data, cloud, and Microsoft-centric digital transformation practice has built out a dedicated generative AI practice with particular depth in healthcare. Its Ukrainian origin means it sits outside the EU proper, though its European delivery centers (including EU member states) give it meaningful EU-adjacent capacity for buyers comfortable with a Ukraine-founded, dual-HQ structure.
Lasting Dynamics
Lasting Dynamics is an award-winning software development company founded in 2015 by Michele Cimmino, with a core operational hub in Naples, Italy and registered headquarters in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, plus an office in Stavanger, Norway. Its roughly 30–36 person team delivers custom software, AI solutions, SaaS platforms, and mobile applications for clients in 30+ countries. As a Spanish/Italian EU entity, it offers a genuinely Southern European delivery option, distinct from the Poland-heavy cluster of firms on this list.
Services and capabilities: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
| Capability | SoftServe | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
| Framework / platform | SoftServe | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
| Criterion | SoftServe | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
| Dimension | SoftServe | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Financial Services, Manufacturing | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Healthcare enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with named healthcare generative-AI depth, Microsoft-centric European enterprises wanting deep Azure AI integration experience | Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster, Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics: pros and cons
| SoftServe | |
|---|---|
| + | Three decades of engineering delivery history since founding in Lviv in 1993 |
| + | Dedicated generative AI practice with particular, named depth in healthcare |
| + | 10,000+ employees gives substantial bench depth for large enterprise programs |
| + | Dual Lviv/Austin structure gives both European and US delivery and account options |
| - | Ukraine-founded, dual-HQ structure means it sits outside strict EU jurisdiction as a legal entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Large organization scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique EU specialists |
| Lasting Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Southern European (Spain/Italy) EU delivery base, distinct jurisdiction from the Poland-heavy cluster on this list |
| + | Over a decade of award-winning software development history since 2015 |
| + | Client base spans 30+ countries despite a compact team |
| + | Additional Norwegian office extends its European footprint further north |
| - | Small team (roughly 30–36 people) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Reported headquarters location varies by source (Las Palmas vs. Naples), worth confirming contracting entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
Who should choose SoftServe?
SoftServe is the right choice for healthcare-focused European enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with three decades of Microsoft-centric digital transformation history..
Three decades of engineering history since 1993 with a dedicated generative AI practice specifically deep in healthcare.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS.
Who should choose Lasting Dynamics?
Lasting Dynamics is the right choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Decision matrix: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lasting Dynamics |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | SoftServe |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: SoftServe (Not published) vs Lasting Dynamics (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | SoftServe |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
| Use case | SoftServe fit | Lasting Dynamics fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with named healthcare generative-AI depth | Strong | Limited | SoftServe |
| Microsoft-centric European enterprises wanting deep Azure AI integration experience | Strong | Limited | SoftServe |
| Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster | Limited | Strong | Lasting Dynamics |
| Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | Limited | Strong | Lasting Dynamics |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Strong | Limited | SoftServe |
Verdict: SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics
SoftServe (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. Three decades of engineering history since 1993 with a dedicated generative AI practice specifically deep in healthcare.. It is best for healthcare-focused European enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with three decades of Microsoft-centric digital transformation history..
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) is the better choice when buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. If your situation matches those criteria, Lasting Dynamics is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
SoftServe vs Lasting Dynamics FAQ
Is SoftServe better than Lasting Dynamics?
SoftServe (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SoftServe is better for healthcare-focused European enterprises wanting agentic AI from a firm with three decades of Microsoft-centric digital transformation history.. Lasting Dynamics is better for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
How do SoftServe and Lasting Dynamics differ in pricing?
SoftServe uses dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Lasting Dynamics uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: SoftServe or Lasting Dynamics?
SoftServe is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between SoftServe and Lasting Dynamics?
SoftServe's primary differentiator is: three decades of engineering history since 1993 with a dedicated generative ai practice specifically deep in healthcare.. Lasting Dynamics's primary differentiator is: a genuinely southern european (spain/italy) delivery base, an alternative eu jurisdiction to the poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Financial Services vs Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.