Endava vs BotsCrew: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.0/5) edges ahead of BotsCrew (3.6/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. BotsCrew is the stronger option for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs BotsCrew: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2016 |
| HQ | London, UK | London, UK |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 51–100 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. | UK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, LangChain | Python, LangChain, OpenAI |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare |
Endava vs BotsCrew: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
BotsCrew
BotsCrew is a conversational AI development company founded in 2016, with reported headquarters in London, UK (also San Francisco) and delivery teams in Lviv, Ukraine and Adelaide, Australia, totaling roughly 73 employees. Led by CEO Nazar Hembara and Managing Director Max Gladysh, it has extended its original chatbot-development practice into autonomous, multi-step agentic systems. Its London office gives it a UK legal entity for European clients, while its Lviv delivery team sits outside the EU proper.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs BotsCrew
| Capability | Endava | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs BotsCrew
| Framework / platform | Endava | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs BotsCrew
| Criterion | Endava | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs BotsCrew
| Dimension | Endava | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | UK and European buyers building autonomous, multi-step conversational agents rather than fixed-tree chatbots, Well-scoped customer-facing agentic dialogue projects for mid-market clients |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs BotsCrew: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
| BotsCrew | |
|---|---|
| + | London office gives it a UK legal entity accessible to European clients |
| + | A decade of dedicated conversational AI development history since 2016 |
| + | Founder-led (Nazar Hembara, Max Gladysh) continuity |
| + | Dialogue-design expertise transfers directly into more natural agentic conversation quality |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside strict EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Lviv, Ukraine delivery team sits outside the EU proper — worth confirming per-project data handling |
| - | ~73-person team caps capacity for large or highly parallel enterprise programs |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Who should choose BotsCrew?
BotsCrew is the right choice for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems..
A decade of dedicated conversational AI/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue, with a UK legal entity.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs BotsCrew
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | BotsCrew |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs BotsCrew (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs BotsCrew
| Use case | Endava fit | BotsCrew fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European buyers building autonomous, multi-step conversational agents rather than fixed-tree chatbots | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Well-scoped customer-facing agentic dialogue projects for mid-market clients | Limited | Strong | BotsCrew |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs BotsCrew
Endava (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. It is best for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
BotsCrew (3.6/5) is the better choice when uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems.. If your situation matches those criteria, BotsCrew is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs BotsCrew FAQ
Is Endava better than BotsCrew?
Endava (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. BotsCrew is better for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems..
How do Endava and BotsCrew differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. BotsCrew uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or BotsCrew?
BotsCrew is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and BotsCrew?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. BotsCrew's primary differentiator is: a decade of dedicated conversational ai/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue, with a uk legal entity.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 51–100), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.