Devoteam vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Devoteam (4.0/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.0/5) overall. Devoteam is the better choice for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, publicly traded French consulting firm.. Endava is the stronger option for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Devoteam vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Devoteam | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1995 | 2000 |
| HQ | Levallois-Perret, France | London, UK |
| Team size | 11,000+ | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Best for | French and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, publicly traded French consulting firm. | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. |
| Pricing model | Retainer, dedicated team, time & materials | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, AWS | Python, OpenAI, LangChain |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare |
Devoteam vs Endava: overview
Devoteam
Devoteam Group is a French tech consulting company founded on December 7, 1995, and headquartered in Levallois-Perret, France, with approximately 11,000 employees as of its most recent public disclosure. It specializes in AI transformations alongside cloud, data, cybersecurity, and sustainability consulting, applying its existing enterprise transformation practice to agentic AI work. As a French-headquartered, publicly traded firm, it offers EU procurement teams a domestic legal entity with financial disclosure comparable to the larger French systems integrators on this list, at a more mid-size scale.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
Services and capabilities: Devoteam vs Endava
| Capability | Devoteam | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Devoteam vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Devoteam | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | ✓ |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Devoteam vs Endava
| Criterion | Devoteam | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Retainer, Dedicated team, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Devoteam vs Endava
| Dimension | Devoteam | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Manufacturing | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | French enterprises wanting agentic AI bundled with existing cloud or cybersecurity consulting, Mid-size European enterprise programs sized between boutique and global-SI scale | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements |
| Typical project type | Retainer | Dedicated team |
Devoteam vs Endava: pros and cons
| Devoteam | |
|---|---|
| + | French-headquartered (Levallois-Perret), publicly traded entity with public financial disclosure |
| + | Three decades of tech consulting history since December 1995 |
| + | 11,000+ employees gives a scale between the largest global SIs and boutique specialists |
| + | Existing cloud, data, and cybersecurity practices give agentic work broader enterprise context |
| - | AI agent development sits within a broader tech consulting portfolio spanning cloud, cybersecurity, and sustainability |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Mid-size scale means less bench depth than the largest global systems integrators for very large programs |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
Who should choose Devoteam?
Devoteam is the right choice for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, publicly traded French consulting firm..
A publicly traded French tech consultancy (11,000+ employees) sized between the large global SIs and the boutique specialists on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Devoteam vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Devoteam |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Devoteam (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Devoteam |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Devoteam vs Endava
| Use case | Devoteam fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| French enterprises wanting agentic AI bundled with existing cloud or cybersecurity consulting | Strong | Limited | Devoteam |
| Mid-size European enterprise programs sized between boutique and global-SI scale | Strong | Limited | Devoteam |
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Limited | Strong | Endava |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Devoteam vs Endava
Devoteam (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A publicly traded French tech consultancy (11,000+ employees) sized between the large global SIs and the boutique specialists on this list.. It is best for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, publicly traded French consulting firm..
Endava (4.0/5) is the better choice when uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. If your situation matches those criteria, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Devoteam vs Endava FAQ
Is Devoteam better than Endava?
Devoteam (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Devoteam is better for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, publicly traded French consulting firm.. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
How do Devoteam and Endava differ in pricing?
Devoteam uses retainer, dedicated team, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Devoteam or Endava?
Devoteam is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Devoteam and Endava?
Devoteam's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded french tech consultancy (11,000+ employees) sized between the large global sis and the boutique specialists on this list.. Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. They also differ in team size (11,000+ vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Financial Services, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.