Boldare vs Deviniti: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Boldare (4.2/5) edges ahead of Deviniti (3.9/5) overall. Boldare is the better choice for european buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with product-design rigor by a firm with 250+ named enterprise references.. Deviniti is the stronger option for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Boldare vs Deviniti: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Boldare | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2004 |
| HQ | Gliwice, Poland | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Best for | European buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with product-design rigor by a firm with 250+ named enterprise references. | EU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, React | Python, Java, LangChain |
| Industries served | Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Financial Services | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
Boldare vs Deviniti: overview
Boldare
Boldare is a Poland-based product development company founded in 2004 (via the earlier XSolve and Chilid, which merged to form Boldare), headquartered in Gliwice with additional EU teams in Warsaw, Wrocław, Kraków, and Hamburg, and roughly 201–500 employees. It has shipped 250+ digital products for clients including BlaBlaCar, Bosch, Sonnen, and Decathlon, and runs a named agentic AI implementation practice. As a Polish company with only EU/EEA offices (Poland plus Hamburg, Germany), it offers a fully intra-EU delivery footprint.
Deviniti
Deviniti is a Wrocław, Poland-based software company founded in 2004 by Piotr Dorosz and Jacek Machata, with roughly 260 employees across Europe and North America. Its established Atlassian Marketplace app and consulting business gives European procurement teams a checkable, independently reviewable track record beyond the vendor's self-reported claims. As a Polish company, it sits fully within EU jurisdiction, and its financial-sector origins mean it has existing compliance-aware delivery experience relevant to GDPR-sensitive agentic AI work.
Services and capabilities: Boldare vs Deviniti
| Capability | Boldare | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Boldare vs Deviniti
| Framework / platform | Boldare | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Boldare vs Deviniti
| Criterion | Boldare | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Boldare vs Deviniti
| Dimension | Boldare | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with real product design and UX investment, European enterprises wanting a single vendor with a track record of 250+ shipped products | EU buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace, Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Boldare vs Deviniti: pros and cons
| Boldare | |
|---|---|
| + | 250+ shipped digital products with named, checkable enterprise clients (BlaBlaCar, Bosch, Sonnen, Decathlon) |
| + | Fully intra-EU delivery footprint — every office is in Poland or Germany |
| + | Two decades of product development history (originally as XSolve and Chilid) since 2004 |
| + | Dedicated agentic AI implementation practice focused on production readiness |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer practice layered onto a broader product-development portfolio |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 201–500 headcount is process-heavier than the smallest boutique specialists on this list |
| Deviniti | |
|---|---|
| + | Atlassian Marketplace and partner listings give procurement an independently checkable track record |
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (Poland), avoiding cross-border data-transfer complexity |
| + | Two decades of enterprise systems-integration experience, originally rooted in financial-sector IT |
| + | Founder-led continuity since 2004 provides institutional stability |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer addition to a legacy enterprise-software and Atlassian practice |
| - | Less name recognition in AI-specific European procurement circles compared to AI-first competitors |
| - | Public agentic-specific case studies are limited relative to its Atlassian portfolio |
Who should choose Boldare?
Boldare is the right choice for european buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with product-design rigor by a firm with 250+ named enterprise references..
250+ shipped digital products with named enterprise clients (BlaBlaCar, Bosch, Decathlon), fully intra-EU delivery footprint (Poland and Germany only).. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Financial Services.
Who should choose Deviniti?
Deviniti is the right choice for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..
An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully EU-domiciled (Poland).. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Boldare vs Deviniti
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Boldare |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Boldare |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Boldare (Not published) vs Deviniti ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Boldare |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Boldare vs Deviniti
| Use case | Boldare fit | Deviniti fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with real product design and UX investment | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| European enterprises wanting a single vendor with a track record of 250+ shipped products | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| EU buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract | Limited | Strong | Deviniti |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Boldare vs Deviniti
Boldare (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. 250+ shipped digital products with named enterprise clients (BlaBlaCar, Bosch, Decathlon), fully intra-EU delivery footprint (Poland and Germany only).. It is best for european buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with product-design rigor by a firm with 250+ named enterprise references..
Deviniti (3.9/5) is the better choice when eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. If your situation matches those criteria, Deviniti is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Boldare vs Deviniti FAQ
Is Boldare better than Deviniti?
Boldare (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Boldare is better for european buyers wanting agentic AI delivered with product-design rigor by a firm with 250+ named enterprise references.. Deviniti is better for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..
How do Boldare and Deviniti differ in pricing?
Boldare uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Deviniti uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Boldare or Deviniti?
Boldare is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Boldare and Deviniti?
Boldare's primary differentiator is: 250+ shipped digital products with named enterprise clients (blablacar, bosch, decathlon), fully intra-eu delivery footprint (poland and germany only).. Deviniti's primary differentiator is: an atlassian marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully eu-domiciled (poland).. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 201–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing vs Financial Services, Manufacturing).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.